Predatory Litigation

How United States courts were designed to produce justice, why they frequently fail in recent years, and what we as a society can do to restore a reasonable expectation of receiving justice through our courts again.

Throughout our nation, unscrupulous law firms are using predatory tactics currently with the complicity of their “friends” and bad actors in local government, while leveraging the power of the courts, to bully, coerce, extort, silence, retaliate, rob, manipulate, control, and deprive honest lawful families of their hard earned wealth, property, inheritances, independence, family members, freedom, social standing, professional accomplishments, peaceful enjoyment and happiness―litigiously terrorizing them under the fraudulent “color of law”, though absolutely repugnant to the rule of law, the court’s codes of conduct, and both our state and federal constitutions.

How can this happen? A simple deviation which has gone unchecked, in how our courts were designed to work to produce justice.

How can litigants determine if the officers of the court are involved in “predatory litigation” on a case by case basis?

Actually, it is pretty easy once you understand their tactics. First of all, ask yourself this question: “are the officers of the court adhering to the court’s codes of conduct?” (Conduct reveals motive.)

When an attorney violates the rules of professional conduct, does the judge correct them, to maintain an impartial tribunal (atmosphere) where the truth is welcome, can honestly be heard, impartially considered, differentiated, and justly decided?

If not, the judge is likely showing bias against you (judicial bias renders the court’s orders null and void), by allowing the attorneys to commit misconduct without correcting them (which is one of the judge’s required duties). This is a clear violation of your constitutional rights to equal and due process by an impartial tribunal. The court has no lawful authority to operate without fully respecting your rights and treating you equally.


There can be no reasonable expectation that any court process would, could, might, or will produce justice short of strict adherence to the courts rules of conduct. That is how the judicial system was designed to work. There is no plan ‘B’. Either the process was administered honestly, impartially, and with justice as the reasonable goal, or it was done with bias, without equal and due process by an impartial tribunal and as a matter of law must be vacated for being void.

Somehow court’s have become unreasonably ambivalent about whether or not the officers of the court strictly adhere to the court’s rules of conduct, while instead demanding strict adherence to other court rules and procedures of practice, which fail to address the merits of a case, but rather a litigants adherence to the process.

Process without good conduct can produce some of the worst crimes against humanity. No process should be rewarded absent good, honest, honorable, and just conduct.


Powerful criminals who have mastered the art of court process, who have friends in high-places throughout local courts, government, social and political circles, who are willing to either participate in crimes, under the fraudulent “color of law” against disadvantaged litigants or whomever has become the “mark of the day”, or turn their heads and refuse to intervene to help the obviously injured parties or report both judicial and attorney misconduct as is required of every “officer of the court” by the rules of both judicial and professional conduct, have become the social parasites who are destroying our judiciary from the inside out.

Those complicit in elevating process over conduct, to leverage the power of our courts and government as a weapon forged against honest, lawful citizens, to unlawfully deprive them of their constitutional rights in this great nation, must be called out, exposed, challenged, and held accountable, lest any reasonable hope and expectation of justice being within the reach of common people in this nation through our courts be lost forever.

There is no honest lawful jurisdiction, authority, or power in the State of Tennessee and their judicial system for the prestigious officers of the court to act as they obviously have toward me and my family throughout this case. Still the State of Tennessee has shown no care or concern for me and my family, nor has it shown any interest or even willingness to investigate my claims, research my case, and discover whether or not the powerful actors involved honestly committed the crimes I have claimed. The state should be concerned that if my claims are true, about the public safety and health of many other family’s throughout middle Tennessee.


My case is not the most significant, but it may prove more clearly than most that some of the named judges, attorneys, clerks, and court oversight administrators involved in my case, have obviously violated their oaths of office, and clearly can’t be trusted to operate honestly, impartially, in the best interests of the public, at any cost.

In my case, the officials involved, haven’t demonstrated any interest or care about the truth, protecting the public, what honestly transpired, or justice, while spending tax dollars to hire attorneys to fight me and deny my family justice (not based upon the merits, but based upon process and technicalities), without ever investing a dollar to investigate the voracity of my claims, to hold the bad actors accountable, to protect the public from further misconduct by those parties (as has caused significant harm in Williamson County Tennessee), to assist me and my family in obtaining justice, and/or surviving the harsh, punitive, unreasonably unlawful, “default” judgments ordered against me in bad faith by defendant Binkley, after I told the courts and oversight divisions about the fraudulent bias and misconduct between defendants Binkley and Story, which they reasonably should have expected based upon their known and publicly exposed history of outrageous misconduct.

Yet every system of the state which has been within my reach has been used to hold me down rather than to help me up or protect me and my family. That’s neither reasonable nor acceptable and shows the heart and motives of those in leadership in Tennessee state government.

The people can’t constitutionally be forced to submit to and participate in an arbitrary system of lawless deprivation of their rights and property, without equal and due process of law, by an impartial tribunal. Yet that is exactly what is happening in Williamson County Chancery Court and throughout many “family courts” around our country. The courts must lawfully require that the officers of the court operate in good faith and good conduct, while using our courts to do substantial justice, for the lawful purposes constitutionally mandated and socially expected. Outside of which our courts have no lawful jurisdiction, authority, role, or power.


The burden of proof needs to be returned to the court and to the officers of the court therein, to prove whenever called into question, that they reasonably operated honestly, lawfully, in pursuit of substantial justice, while maintaining strict adherence to the codes of conduct at all times.

At anytime, when a litigant can reasonably demonstrate that a court substantially failed in that core responsibility (especially in civil matters which are often denied due process) for exercising jurisdiction, authority, and power over any matter or litigant, the court should be proactive about reviewing that case and quickly vacate any judgments which were procured subsequent to misconduct, or where good professional conduct or judicial conduct was obviously lacking.

For those who claim that the government or the courts can not afford to give all litigants equal access to justice, or guarantee the results of each judicial proceeding to such a degree of liability and proactive responsibility, I exhort this: If a state lacks the resources to ensure that it is not depriving citizen of their property or rights unlawfully, then the state lacks the jurisdiction and authority to deprive those citizens of their property or rights.


The burden of proof must rest upon those who seek to take from others. Whether a claimant, a company, a creditor, a court, a state, or anyone else. A citizen must be left whole, unmolested, and undeprived, except as can be lawfully justified, substantiated, and proven beyond any reasonable doubt. Subject to honest and lawful scrutiny both at the time of taking, and at any time thereafter, especially when justice failed to meet the appearance of justice in the first place.

Any litigant, claimant, company, creditor, court, state, which finds such liability and responsibility for operating honestly, legally, in good faith, with good conduct, “overbearing”, might best be served (to the substantial benefit of society at large) by removing themselves from the business of taking from others, and/or limiting such practice to only the extreme cases, which truly justifies both the due diligence and the risk which should have always closely accompanied leveraging the courts to take from others.

Sometimes the right answer just makes sense.