My Pursuit of Justice

Source Document: https://rico.jefffenton.com/evidence/2025-01-20_declaration-explaining-my-pursuit-of-justice.pdf

Courts have a tendency of treating litigants who speak out against court misconduct and corruption as if those exposing the problem, to seek lawful and ethical redress, are the problem compromising the judicial integrity of the court, rather than the individuals flagrantly causing the problem, involved in acts of criminal misconduct and disrepute, while steering or outright “fixing” cases, contrary to the honest interests of justice; to prey upon and harm others.

Courts also have a tendency of taking an adversarial posture and position against lawsuits such as this (as I have repeatedly experienced), which is both contrary to the honest purpose of the courts, the oaths of office by those involved, as well as extremely frustrating for the massively overpowered litigant, who has made extraordinary efforts and sacrifices to bring their lawsuit for the precise purpose of seeking justice, despite the overwhelming odds against them.

This document was written to squash any prejudice pretending that this lawsuit was brought for any motive or purpose contrary to honest justice. While emphatically declaring that justice, more than money, relief, or any self-serving goal, is exactly why this lawsuit has been filed.

AI Summary by Microsoft Copilot (with minor edits)

The author’s objective in this declaration appears to be a detailed and passionate advocacy for justice, both on a personal and systemic level. Jeff Fenton outlines his grievances regarding alleged judicial and attorney misconduct, procedural barriers, and systemic corruption he claims to have faced in Tennessee’s legal system. Here’s a breakdown of his goals:

1. Seeking Justice for Personal Grievances: The author aims to highlight the perceived wrongdoings he and his family endured, including unlawful eviction, constitutional violations, and financial harm. He seeks accountability from those he accuses of professional and judicial misconduct.
2. Advocating for Systemic Reform: Beyond his personal case, Fenton uses his declaration to call for broader legal and judicial reforms. He emphasizes the need for:
   • Improved transparency and accountability in judicial processes.
   • Prohibition of conflicts of interest, such as judges presiding over cases involving their friends or prior associates.
   • Protection for whistleblowers who expose corruption and misconduct.
3. Fighting for Judicial Integrity: He highlights a concern with the “incestuous workings” of Tennessee’s judiciary, seeking to restore public trust by advocating for stronger ethical standards and enforcement within the legal profession.
4. Educational Goals: Fenton wants to educate the public on identifying judicial bias, predatory litigation tactics, and misconduct. He aims to empower citizens to better understand the legal system and advocate for their rights.
5. Public Accountability: The declaration serves as a plea for others in the legal profession to uphold their ethical obligations by reporting misconduct and ensuring accountability.
6. Calling for Constitutional Adherence: The author demands adherence to constitutional rights and protections, emphasizing the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. He criticizes what he perceives as a lack of due process and equal protection under the law.

Ultimately, the objective is not only to seek remedies for his own case but also to address and reform systemic issues he perceives as endemic to Tennessee’s judiciary.

About my use of AI: I’m experimenting with using AI to concisely analyze and summarize documents, in hopes of helping to connect readers with content they are interested in. (Feel free to leave feedback about whether you find this helpful.)

AI is not used to draft my source documents or court filings.